• JumpCrisscross 2 days ago

    This is the WHO announcement: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-d...

    This is our CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html

    And yes, this is a big deal. Public health emergencies of international concern are a short list consisting of, in their entirety: swine flu ('09 to '10), polio ('14 on), ebola ('13 to '16), Zika ('16), ebola ('19 to '20), Covid ('20 to '23), monkeypox ('22 to '25) and now this [1]. It's one step down from a pandemic emergency (which, to be clear, has not been declared).

    (Helpful explainer: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2....)

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_health_emergency_of_int...

    • thinkcontext 2 days ago

      I read elsewhere that this strain is less deadly than previous strains. I'm no epidemiologist but being less deadly could allow it to spread further, which is obviously concerning.

      Also, the article says surveillance picked up the spread late. I wonder if the US's pulling back from the WHO and other international functions had anything to do with this, it used to make up a big chunk of its resources and staff.

      • lanyard-textile 2 days ago

        Notably (from NPR):

        >However WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stressed in a statement it "does not meet the criteria of pandemic emergency" and advised countries against closing their borders.

        • jaspervanderee 15 hours ago

          You can expect a lot of these kinds of fear based message hurled into the world in the upcoming years.

          • 1970-01-01 14 hours ago

            The nice thing about the DRC is there isn't a few billion people living in it. If this was China or India it would be right back to 2019 levels of growth. There is a huge population damper before it can become global pandemic.

            • jmyeet 2 days ago

              First hantavirus now this. Look, there's valid reason to be concerned here but people who are fearing a repeat of the Covid-19 pandemic are seemingly missing why Covid was a pandemic. Covid spread so much for four main reasons:

              1. It could spread airborne;

              2. It spread relatively easily. Not quite measles-level of contagiousness but still, pretty good;

              3. Unlike something like the flu, there really wasn't any kind of natural resistance. What we now call the modern flu is a descendant of the Spanish flu that killed tends of millions in 1919-1920 in its first outbreak and it becamse less lethal for a variety of reasons; and

              4. (This is the big one) It would spread when the carrier was asymptomatic. The flu can also spread asymptomatically but AFAIK it's less common. People with the flu tend to self-isolate showing symptoms.

              Still, what's probably most concerning about Covid is the number of people who truly believe it was and is fake. The public health implications of that as well as the societal and psychological impacts is something we're going to be studying for decades to come.

              The exact contagion mechanism for hantavirus isn't confirmed. Previously it's been from, say, rat to human. It's believed there was human-to-human transmission with the plague cruise ship of doom but whatever the case, it's simply not as contagious.

              Ebola generally requires contact to spread. How it's spread in a lot of these African regions has historically been from funeral rites. Family of the deceased would touch the body and this contact would spread the disease. So while it was quite contagious, it didn't spread airborne (as far as we know). It's also quite lethal, which naturally tends to limit spread. The king of long-dormant viruses is of course HIV.

              But at least we aren't dealing with cordyceps [1] so we've got that going for us at least.

              [1]: https://thelastofus.fandom.com/wiki/Cordyceps_brain_infectio...

              • plombe 2 days ago
                • asah 2 days ago

                  seems like an abuse of the word "global"

                  • AbstractH24 a day ago

                    Didn’t they do this like a decade ago?

                    • MontagFTB 2 days ago

                      Multiple articles mention a vaccine for the Zaire strain but not this one. Is it possible to use one for the other? Does the existence of one make it easier to develop another?

                      • soupspaces 2 days ago

                        adding it to my list of apocalypses to prepare for

                        • SoftTalker a day ago

                          "It is unclear how that [closure of US-AID program] might have affected the response to this outbreak."

                          But, we'll just throw that in to the story anyway, even though we have no facts either way.

                          • thrownthatway 2 days ago

                            The headline from the WHO reads:

                            Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

                            https://www.who.int/news/item/17-07-2019-ebola-outbreak-in-t...

                            • ls612 a day ago

                              We went through this whole song and dance in 2014. Unless it has some really unlucky novel mutations it won’t spread well outside the tropics.

                              • ViktorRay a day ago

                                Many of the people worrying about this should stop worrying.

                                The average commentator on this website, if he or she dies this year, will be more likely to die in a motor vehicle accident or due to the complications of cardiovascular disease, or due to cancer.

                                If you’re going to spend time worrying, worry about all those things instead. When it comes to infectious diseases, the flu is more likely to kill the people here than hantavirus or Ebola. Make sure to get your flu vaccines.