• Starlevel004 an hour ago

    > Designing a product with billions of eyeballs on it isn't just challenging — it requires a fundamentally different approach.

    I'm not reading this.

    • thorum 37 minutes ago

      Their design approach wasn’t particularly unusual, so I’m not sure what that sentence means.

      I do miss the days when technical reports were clear and concise. This one has some interesting information, but it’s buried under a mountain of empty AI-written bloat.

      • dematz 26 minutes ago

        It's annoying because it is a super common widget and it is interesting work, the first draft or literally even prompt they gave the AI probably would've been a great post, all they had to do was not ensloppify it...

      • upmind an hour ago

        Did you base the AI use on the emdash or is this an a common AI phrase (or both)?

        • Starlevel004 an hour ago

          "Not just X -- it's Y" is one of the more irritatingly common signs, especially for sentences like that one which absolutely do not need it.

          The Wikipedia article on detecting AI writing is a big help if you need to calibrate your sensors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing

          • mock-possum 41 minutes ago

            Yeah it’s basically the prose equivalent of getting too much radio play - hilarious how the breakthrough of LLM content has ‘ruined’ “it’s not X—it’s Y” for so many of us now

            Maybe, like overplayed pop songs, in 20 years or so we’ll come around to viewing the phrase fondly.

            • upmind an hour ago

              I see, thx for the article too!

              • upmind an hour ago

                I think I'll actually post the article here, quite useful

              • TacticalCoder 6 minutes ago

                > "Not just X -- it's Y" is one of the more irritatingly common signs ...

                It's a bit of a "Karen AI" telltale sign. It's probably been trained on a lot of "I-know-it-all-Karen" posts and as a result we're bombarded with Karen-slop.

              • mh2266 2 minutes ago

                "Let's be honest" is another extremely strong tell.

                • Retr0id an hour ago

                  It's not just overused phrasing — it's the hallmark of LLM prose.

                  • iamacyborg an hour ago

                    “It’s not X, it’s Y” is an absolutely ubiquitous AI pattern. Throw in an em-dash and it’s basically ai;dr

                    • upmind an hour ago

                      Thx!

                    • mostlysimilar 38 minutes ago

                      It's also just an utterly meaningless statement. Filler words with no value whatsoever.

                    • JadedBlueEyes 42 minutes ago

                      Yet again [0] quality standards seem to have slipped on the cloudflare blog. I'm not able to point at a cause, but it's not painting a pretty picture.

                      [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46781516

                      • CapsAdmin 15 minutes ago

                        It kinda looks like employees need to make a blog post about something twice a month.

                      • tamimio 21 minutes ago

                        I remember back I think around 2011, CF was new and I was testing it on some vbulletin forum, all the email communication were with the cofounder if I recall correctly, the UI had only the dns settings back then. Now they make a whole article on some text redesign, time flies.

                        • andrepd 23 minutes ago

                          That's why I say most AI content isn't just slop—it's fundamentally about deception. It's about tricking someone into believing that a text was written by a human, or that a photo or video is a true recording of a real event.

                          Like this, its purpose is to fly under the radar unless your figurative ears are pricked up and primed to detect the telltale signs. Fuck this shit.

                        • christina97 an hour ago

                          Am I reading it right, the widget is seen 5B times per day, and they recruited 8 people for testing to make sure their “redesign would work for everyone”…?

                          • kingkongjaffa 22 minutes ago

                            The process described in the article is literally just checking the boxes blindly for what passes for a design process these days. The guru's say interview customers so they have done just that without really understanding why. Given it's AI it's also possible the whole thing is entirely made up and someone just tweaked the design over an afternoon and shipped it.

                            • KolmogorovComp 34 minutes ago

                              This! The comment I was angrily about to write.

                              • jazzpush2 29 minutes ago

                                Why? Genuinely, who cares? Is some demographic group not caught in the 8 going to be offended by basic checkbox screen? Is someone with a niche form of colorblindness going to have difficulty navigating the UI?

                                • KolmogorovComp 20 minutes ago

                                  How can you seriously pretend to do any study with only eight people involved? Especially when your company is worth billion. It just calls for bad press and criticism of amateurism.

                                  • madeofpalk 19 minutes ago

                                    I mean, yes? A very broad spectrum of people need to use the internet, and cloudflare has inserted themselves in the middle of it.

                                    I don't necessarily find a problem with them, but its weird how they boasted about massive scale and importance of this, but then only just went with 8 tests.

                                • mock-possum 39 minutes ago

                                  With a bit of A/B testing they could’ve recruited billions of people sounds like…

                                • noplacelikehome an hour ago

                                  As a user of an unsigned Firefox fork, Turnstile has ruined a moderate portion of the Internet for me. The way Cloudflare doesn’t think twice about eroding user freedoms, for the sake of a gate that can be trivially bypassed with solvarr or similar, is deeply disturbing. They are no longer a force for good on the web.

                                  • tempest_ an hour ago

                                    As bad as cloudflare is there is a reason people use it.

                                    If you try and run a site that has content that LLMs want or expensive calls that require a lot of compute and can exhaust resources if they are over used the attack is relentless. It can be a full time job trying to stop people who are dedicated to scrapping the shit out of your site.

                                    Even CF doesnt even really stop it any more. The agent run browsers seem to bypass it with relative ease.

                                    • neoromantique an hour ago

                                      Vast majority of websites today can and should be static, which makes even the aggressive llm scrapping non-issue.

                                      • PaulDavisThe1st an hour ago

                                        One of the things that a lot of LLM scrapers are fetching are git repositories. They could just use git clone to fetch everything at once. But instead, they fetch them commit by commit. That's about as static as you can get, and it is absolutely NOT a non-issue.

                                        • LoganDark 44 minutes ago

                                          No... Basically all git servers have to generate the file contents, diffs etc. on-demand because they don't store static pages for every single possible combination of view parameters. Git repositories also typically don't store full copies of all versions of a file that have ever existed either; they're incremental. You could pre-render everything statically, but that could take up gigabytes or more for any repo of non-trivial size.

                                          • KolmogorovComp 32 minutes ago

                                            > Git repositories also typically don't store full copies of all versions of a file that have ever existed either; they're incremental

                                            This is wrong. Git does store full copies.

                                          • neoromantique 34 minutes ago

                                            that's a pretty niche issue, but fairly easy to solve.

                                            Prebuild statically the most common commits (last XX) and heavily rate limit deeper ones

                                      • sebzim4500 26 minutes ago

                                        How does Cloudflare know you are using the fork? Can you not just set the user agent to match firefox's (or even chrome's for that matter)

                                        • flexagoon an hour ago

                                          I see people saying that a lot, but I use Zen which is a fork of Firefox and I don't think I've ever had an issue with Turnstile, at least not noticeably more than I had on mobile Chrome.

                                          • pchew an hour ago

                                            Zen has been signed for close to a year.

                                          • tick_tock_tick an hour ago

                                            Isn't it the opposite? They allow you to still use it when it would almost certainly be better for cloudflare and the website behind then to just block you.

                                          • Retr0id an hour ago

                                            Their final design looks incredibly visually unbalanced, the icon on the left does not have enough breathing room on the left and right.

                                            • diath 25 minutes ago

                                              Will this also be accompanied by a global Turnstile outage like all the other Cloudflare services that get touched? If they end up vibeslopping the redesign like they did with this article, it may just happen.

                                              • altern8 30 minutes ago

                                                CloudFlare might be good for site owners, but many times their page makes me click back to search results.

                                                I can't be the only one.

                                                It's slow and annoying, AI overview is good enough for me most of the times so that added time I bet makes websites lose a lot of visits.

                                                • jdprgm 29 minutes ago

                                                  Remember when we used to care about sub 100ms page loading time and now we have introduced a best case 5 second blocker all over the place.

                                                  • stevebmark an hour ago

                                                    37 em dashes :(

                                                    • upmind an hour ago

                                                      If this truly was written with AI it's really quite poor. Some of the employees at Cloudflare seem to be negligent tbh based off the fact they've been down so many times recently

                                                      • DavidVoid 42 minutes ago

                                                        I like em dashes—and sometimes overuse them—but 37 times is absurd in that amount of text.

                                                        • mock-possum 39 minutes ago

                                                          That’d make a good tongue in cheek band name for AI music

                                                        • masswerk 24 minutes ago

                                                          > We recruited 8 participants across 8 different countries, deliberately seeking diversity in age, digital savviness, and cultural background.

                                                          > 5 out of 8 points versus just 3 for "I am human." For the verifying state, it was even more dramatic — 7.5 versus 0.5.

                                                          n × p >= 5? (Sample size and margins of errors. Is 5:3 even meaningful or is this rather random personal preference?) Apparent splitting of missing or inconclusive data points? (7.5 vs. 0.5 out of a total of 8 subjects.) What kind of (social) research is this supposed to be?

                                                          • furyofantares 37 minutes ago

                                                            LLM-ass written content about this widget nobody wants but is necessary due to bots. Fuck off and write the post yourself.