• 3eb7988a1663 an hour ago

    Is Microsoft ever going to implement proper VS Code plugin sandboxing? There are so many good extensions I would like to use, but I hate the security implications of loading yet more unvetted code for a nice-to-have.

    Then again, I see that the top buzz in the industry is about Claws and letting LLMs run loose with only a handshake agreement to be safe, and I already know the answer.

    • MantisShrimp90 an hour ago

      The only real answer is something like web assembly and that would be a major breaking change for them.

      This is why allot run dev containers but agreed this really should be top priority but instead is probably in the "maybe if we have a major security incident" bucket of concerns as these things often are

      • frehu an hour ago

        There's no malware in it currently, but I understand your concerns - I could be lying, go rogue later, or just get my access stolen.

        One option is to vet a version yourself and disable auto-update, but that's not really feasible to spend time on for most people.

        • 3eb7988a1663 an hour ago

          Sorry, no sleight intended against you, just a general concern as more and more cool utilities keep getting built into the platform.

          • frehu an hour ago

            No offense taken, you actually made me reconsider trying out random extensions that sound like mine to make sure i'm not reinventing the wheel

        • benatkin 41 minutes ago

          Doesn't seem like it. It will be stuck in a security theater situation, just like Chrome extensions. Not an upgrade from the old highly powerful firefox extensions or those of the Atom text editor.

        • helle253 an hour ago

          This is really neat - i especially like the heatmap, makes it very easy to immediately figure out what is actively being worked on, even in the regular file explorer view

          that said, I'm not sure i plan on using it long term - as someone else pointed out, the lack of extension sandboxing does make me feel a bit uncomfortable for extensions like this that aren't backed by large entities.

          • timfsu 36 minutes ago

            Love this idea. Working with AI assistants, I find it easier to push to GitHub to look at the changes, rather than use my IDE. I wish that wasn’t the case, so this makes a ton of sense.

            • aquir 28 minutes ago

              This is a great idea! I will give it a try!

              • banku_brougham 2 hours ago

                looks pretty cool! Ive definitely been wanting some improvement in file discovery and exploration

                • frehu 2 hours ago

                  File explorer with a twist - instead of 5000 files of which you need to see 20, shows pending changes + files modified within a time window (pending, 3 days, 7 days, 30 days, etc.) pulled from Git history. This way you don't get lost browsing everything or lose track of your work immediately after a commit.

                  Beyond the core concept, there's also

                  - A heatmap that colors files based on recency

                  - Deleted files appear in the tree where they used to be

                  - A pinned section for files that are not recent but handy

                  - File history, diff search (pickaxe) and git log -L line/function history available from editor context menu

                  - File grouping based on the moon phase during the most recent commit (good luck finding alternative software for this)

                  • brcmthrowaway 31 minutes ago

                    Is there something like this integrated with Ctrl P vim?

                    • frehu 13 minutes ago

                      I don't use vim so i'm not sure what you mean exactly, but if you want a file quick pick like vscode's ctrl+p but for the fresh files, that's something i have - the default binding is ctrl+q, f.