• dang 32 minutes ago

    Comments* moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47096253, which has the original source.

    We will add the current link to the toptext there as well.

    (* except for the ones that only make sense in current context - that's the intention at least)

    • bjackman 9 hours ago
      • hizanberg 8 hours ago

        Why is this linking to a blog post of what someone said, instead of directly linking to what they said?

        [1] https://x.com/karpathy/status/2024987174077432126

      • dcreater 6 hours ago

        [flagged]

        • thedevilslawyer 6 hours ago

          Rubbish. Simon is a good independent voice in capturing the llm zeitgeist.

          • blibble 3 hours ago

            Simon Willison claims to be an "Independent AI researcher"[1]:

            but then at the top of this article:

            > Sponsored by: Teleport — Secure, Govern, and Operate AI at Engineering Scale. Learn more

            not exactly a coherent narrative, is it?

            [1]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net

            • simonw 3 hours ago

              I wrote a little note about that here - it even opens with "I value my credibility as an independent voice" https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/19/sponsorship/

              I get (incorrectly) accused of writing undisclosed sponsored content pretty often, so I'm actually hoping that the visible sponsor banner will help people resist that temptation because they can see that the sponsorship is visible, not hidden.

              • blibble 3 hours ago

                > I value my credibility as an independent voice

                not enough to not take their money though?

                insipid

                • simonw 2 hours ago

                  I'm currently planning to avoid sponsorship from companies that I regularly write about for that reason.

                  • blibble 2 hours ago

                    > I'm currently planning to avoid sponsorship from companies that I regularly write about for that reason.

                    ah so if it's not "regular" (which is completely arbitrary), then it's fine to call yourself independent while directly taking money from people you're talking about?

                    glad we cleared up the ambiguity around your ethical framework

                    • simonw 2 hours ago

                      You're welcome to stop reading me if you think my ethics are irreversibly corrupted and you can no longer trust my writing.

                      Thankfully most of my readers are better at evaluating their information sources than you are.

                      • blibble 2 hours ago

                        to stop reading would imply I ever started

                        from my point of view: it never was writing, it's a deliverable

                        and it ends up here with such monotonous regularity that the community appears to be beginning to regard it as spam

          • simonw 4 hours ago

            You know I helped popularize "slop"? I get credited by Wikipedia as an "early champion": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop