• xorvoid a day ago

    I feel like the comments are taking away the wrong message from this. He used it to do the part of the project that he has poor knowledge/experience/capacity for. He needs a visualization but the project isn't about visualization. He's spent a lifetime coding in C, not writing python-based visualizations.

    There's a big difference between vibe-coding an entire project and having an AI build a component that you lack competency for. That is what is happening here.

    It's the same principle as a startup that builds it core functionality itself in-house and then uses off-the-shelf libraries for all the other uninteresting details.

    • 999900000999 a day ago

      >Add README and LICENSE file I'm pushing it out to github not because it needs to be public, but because of my policy of using the internet as my backups. And because it makes it so much easier to just sync between machines.

      Very cool to see a legends side project. I'll check this out when I have time even though I can't understand C well.

    • hu3 a day ago

      BassForLinus.mp3 ?

      I never clicked a file so fast in my life before.

      It's a tame bass sample sound. Probably from Linus himself. I want more!

      https://github.com/torvalds/AudioNoise/blob/main/BassForLinu...

      • irusensei a day ago

        Is he slapping at 00:53? Can't wait til Davie504's cover.

      • the_biot a day ago

        That is truly sad :-(

        • numpad0 19 hours ago

          What's truly "sad" is that it's ok if Google does it. It's apparently not ok when OpenAI, Musk, etc do literally the same thing.

          This whole controversy reminds me of that Rhodesian designed shotgun marketed as "Street Sweeper" in the US. Making a tool is one thing. Brandishing its unsafe working end to potential customers in an attempt to impress them, alas, could lead to interesting situations...

          • theflyingelvis a day ago

            Why is that?

            • rvz 15 hours ago

              Depends.

              This is on projects that are not serious. So I will treat it as such.

              You should worry if vibe-coders submit patches to the Linux Kernel and they do not understand them.

            • appsoftware a day ago

              It's official, vibe coding is legit.

              • wasmainiac 12 hours ago

                No it’s not, there are so many issues yet to be solved. Privacy, responsibility, etc. It literally says nothing for prototyping, we have all done it.

                • _zoltan_ a day ago

                  it's always been.

                  • wasmainiac 12 hours ago

                    You mean you want it to be.

                    • _zoltan_ 7 hours ago

                      I use it daily and it just works. If you haven't found your agentic workflow or you don't prompt it well, that's not an ecosystem problem.

                      • wasmainiac 3 hours ago

                        That is my point it’s a you thing. Maybe your QC are lower than mine? I don’t know. No one else on my team uses it for that reason alone.

                  • whattheheckheck a day ago

                    No tests, mypy type hinting or doc strings -- just pure vibes

                    • forgotpwd16 15 hours ago

                      Depends on stage. Codex/Claude-generated code have hinting and doc strings, and will gladly add tests for every change you're doing. (That's why vibe coded projects have a gazillion tests.)

                      • whattheheckheck 7 hours ago

                        I wa referring to linus' script in the repo