• altairprime an hour ago

    This is thematically amazing when you consider what the song is about — the roboticization of the abducted band. (Music video:)

    https://youtu.be/gAjR4_CbPpQ

    In this song, which is also chapter four of the movie Interstella 5000 movie (spoilers from here!), the knocked-out singers are scanned, parameterized, brainwashed, uploaded into The Matrix, and then used in the following songs of the movie-album to robotically mass produce music.

    It makes perfect sense that the BPM is 123.45 because that’s exactly the sort of thing you get when a manager (who’s shown at the end!) just enters some numbers on the keyboard into the bpm field. They don’t keysmash the numpad; they just hit 123456789 until the field is full!

    So not only does the song itself convey what some boss thinks is music, robotically beating at 123.45 bpm, but it is itself about being endlessly-rotating brainwashed-boring cogs in a pop music production industrial machine. I’m pretty sure the movie scene cuts and animations are timed specifically to the beats of the song, but knowing that they’re timed to a machine-specific bpm that a human would never select at random with a metronome?

    Absolute genius.

    I had no idea. Thanks for posting this.

    EDIT: At 123.4567bpm, I think it has precisely 0.2345 seconds of silence before the first 'beat' of the song and actually has 456 beats total, which is either numerological nonsense or pure genius by Daft Punk. Math elsethread :)

    • HelloUsername 4 minutes ago

      Just tried this in Reaper. It's actually much closer to 123.47

      Anyway that album, Discovery, is full of funny bits. Track #11 Veridis Quo sounds like "very disco". Turn those two words around, and you got the album's title.

      • xvxvx 2 hours ago

        Thinking back to when Aphex Twin encoded his face into a track: https://www.bastwood.com/?page_id=10

      • jonas21 39 minutes ago

        There's a minor issue with the calculations. It should be:

            60 * 445 / 216.276 = 123.453365145
            
            60 * 445 / 216.282 = 123.449940356
        
        Not the other way around. And since the timing is only given with millisecond accuracy, the bpm should be rounded to the same number of significant digits:

            60 * 445 / 216.276 = 123.453
            
            60 * 445 / 216.282 = 123.450
        
        So, it's the YouTube version that's 123.45 bpm to within the rounding error.
        • altairprime 20 minutes ago

          Huh. Get out your red string and pushpins because this inspired a theory.

          So if the correct pair of values there ends up being 445 / 216.27000197, then it'll be:

          60 * 445 / 216.27000197 = 123.456789

          Or, since one of those programs had four decimals:

          60 * 445 / 216.27015788 = 123.4567

          Or, if it's 444/446 rather than 445:

          60 * 444 / 215.78415752 = 123.4567

          60 * 446 / 216.75615823 = 123.4567

          But I see that they cut the "whooshing intro" at the front, which I imagine is part of the beat — they're in the hands of the machine now, after all! — so if we retroactively construct 123.4567 bpm into the silence (which, they estimate, is 5.58s):

          5.58s * (123.4567bpm / 60s) = 11.4814731 beats

          Assuming that the half a beat of slop silence there has to do with format / process limitations with CD track-seeking rather than specific artistic intent, we get:

          +11 intervals @ 123.4567 bpm = 5.346s

          Which, when added to the original calculation, shows:

          60 * (445 + 11) / (3:41.85 - (0.5.58s - 0:5.346s)) = 123.4567 bpm

          And so we end up with a duration of 221.616 seconds between the calculated 'first' beat, a third of a second into the song, and the measured 'last' beat from the post:

          60 * 456 / 221.616 = 123.4567 bpm

          Or if we use the rounded 123.45 form:

          60 * 456 / 221.628 = 123.45 bpm

          And while that 22+1.628 is-that-a-golden-ratio duration is interesting and all, the most important part here is that, with 123.4567bpm, I think it's got precisely 0.2345 seconds of silence before the first 'beat' of the song (the math checks out^^ to three digits compared against the first 'musical beat' at 5.58s!), and so I think there's actually 456 beats in the robotic 123.45 song!

          :D

          ^^ the math, because who doesn't love a parenthetical with a footnote in a red-string diagram (cackles maniacally)

          5.58s - (60 * 11/123.4567) = 0.2339961 ~= 0.234

          5.58057179s = 0.23456789 + (60 * 11/123.4567)

        • moomin 21 minutes ago

          My supplemental question would be: what BPM is Cola Bottle Baby?

          • alexjplant 2 minutes ago

            For those not in the know "Cola Bottle Baby" is the Edwin Birdsong tune [1] that Daft Punk sampled for "Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger". I heard the sample first but think I prefer the original at this point (despite the songs being different genres). Lots of interesting stuff going on with the bass guitar and chorus that's missing in the Daft Punk cut.

            [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiD39jo5Yo4

          • oars 27 minutes ago

            Daft Punk continues to awe us, even after their retirement.

            Can't believe it's been almost 20 years since Alive 2007!

            • boca_honey 4 minutes ago

              Non related. Are your comments translated with AI or AI generated?

            • chews 15 minutes ago

              Daft Punk are totally of the smart sort to do this kind of easteregg. They're just a clever band, another fun Daft Punk easter egg, they were in a band with Phoenix called Darlin'. (Daft Punk got their name from a review of the Darlin' record)

              • brcmthrowaway an hour ago

                Tell me when we can get realtime stem splitting!

                • shermantanktop 15 minutes ago

                  You already have a hardware-accelerated pair attached to your head!