• omneity 6 days ago

    Great job, congrats for the release! A little feedback, it could be nice to auto-generate a unique url on page load (the one you generate after clicking on "share"). Bonus is that it gives the user a certain confidence to reload the page for example.

    Side note, I am wondering if this could be used as a better way to collaborate with coding agents. "Pair with me" instead of the typical "Code for me".

    • mrktsm__ 6 days ago

      Thanks for the feedback! I clear the session URL after joining because I thought it looked cleaner, but I might start leaving it in if it helps with reload confidence.

    • jasonjmcghee 6 days ago

      Great project!

      As you mentioned vscode- I don't believe the sharee needs an account unless that's changed. (And you can do it all in browser).

      https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/liveshare/qui...

      But executing code is a different story. Replit works better there but it's heavily resource constrained in free tier.

      • tpae 6 days ago

        Question for you, how come you didn't use CDRT like yjs? It could simplify the codebase

        • mrktsm__ 6 days ago

          Good question — before diving into the project, I did have the chance to choose. I looked into both OT and CRDTs and found that OT is widely used in collaborative editors like Google Docs, so I leaned that way. I wouldn’t say it was a deeply informed decision — I just had more reference points for OT at the time. I think with more hands-on experience with CRDTs, I’d be better equipped to weigh the trade-offs more clearly

          • ggap 6 days ago

            Well done on this! I will keep an eye on the project

        • indigodaddy 5 days ago

          Does the preview work for dynamic server content eg python, nodejs, php etc?

          • mrktsm__ 5 days ago

            Currently, the JS, HTML, and CSS are rendered client-side, which was relatively straightforward to implement. However, I’m in the process of moving these files to the server and serving them from there, which will enable me to execute languages that aren’t natively supported by the browser

          • nanna 6 days ago

            I would love this for Emacs!

            • n3storm 6 days ago

              [flagged]

              • mrktsm__ 6 days ago

                Yeah, you're very correct actually. I chose Java because I'm most comfortable with it, but in retrospect, Node might have been a better choice. There’s some shared logic for the collaboration part, and it was a bit of a hassle to ensure the client and backend had the same logic. Having both in JavaScript would have made things smoother

                • rizky05 6 days ago

                  [dead]

                • spruce_tips 6 days ago

                  java 23+ kicks ass. it's come a long way

                  • undefined 6 days ago
                    [deleted]