Fun little game. Financial Times should however, not be leant upon as having a reliable take on what action is needed.

The main dodgy takes I noticed were - over emphasis on cars and roads with limited funding for rail based transport (physics works people, as do the OG economics of rail barons, eg economic activation occurs where new stations go in) - continual references to carbon capture and storage which is a totally junk science

Carbon Caoture and storage is straight up junk science that cleverly allows climate R&D fundings to go straight to fossil fuel companies. The earth is like a big unreliable sponge, there is no reliable evenly vaguely cost-practical way of pouring carbon underground and popping a lid on it so none comes out for years and years.