I donated bone marrow about 10 years ago. It was an exhausting process, though no worse than dealing with a bad cold. After about two years (if I remember correctly), we exchanged details through the organization that facilitates these donations. However, the recipient never reached out to me. Out of curiosity, I googled the person and discovered this person was apparently a neo-nazi (at least very very right leaning) from East Germany.
As someone who has been trained in CPR, looking into the patient world views before deciding to help is not good. Trying to weight if a human life is worth saving generally only leads to a very dark place that only game theory scientists and philosophers should do.
Thankfully in EU we have laws against this in terms of human rights. Doctors can not refuse to provide medical help to anyone regardless of patients world views. Far leaning left, far leaning right, women, men, color of skin and so on. If blood or organ donations would start to allow discrimination based on world views then such restrictions would be struck down in courts, based on the same principles that is behind the opposition to Neo-nazism.
Definitely agree with you on this. It was a bit disappointing when I found out. As for bone marrow, I’ve got plenty to give, but in the 18 years I’ve been registered, I’ve only been contacted twice. One of those times, if I recall correctly, they said I wasn’t a good enough match.
Imagine donating to a neo-Nazi while a good person you could have donated to wither and dies. Fuck this, your body your choice. We should get to choose, and if we can’t, then I can see why someone would choose to not donate at all.
[dead]
The ethics of organ distribution is complex, and I wouldn't want to be on the committee deciding who is worthy and who is not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_organ_transplantatio...
https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethi...
The ethics of organ distribution usually do not look into the worthiness of the person needing the organ, but rather the effectiveness of the procedure. If the medical intervention is unlikely to be effective, the limited medical resources is better to be allocated elsewhere. Behavior and access to social support can be part of the assessment of how effective the procedure will be, but it doesn't weight the social worthiness of the patient.
This principle is similar to why palliative care is different from medical care. At some point the effectiveness of health care is so low that it mostly do more harm or drain resources better allocated to other patients. It is not that elderly people are not worthy of health care, and the ethical considerations focus on making sure its not a value based judgement about who should live and who shouldn't.
I hope that your gift of life to him will one day make him realize life is too fleeting to be expend it on such a hateful ideology.
If you seek contact simply fly from Berlin airports, the recipient will search and frisk you.
The writing in this piece is a bit over-wrought (funnily enough, I don't mind that so much now that it makes me think it was written by a real person and not an AI), but it's still worth reading.
Donating blood marrow (or stem cells) is the easiest way you could ever save a life. I encourage everyone to sign up:
US - https://www.nmdp.org/get-involved/join-the-registry
UK - https://www.anthonynolan.org/help-save-a-life/join-stem-cell...
This story involved stem cells, but for those of you who might worry about the bone marrow extraction procedure, which is reputed to be painful, I've had one - a biopsy for a medical diagnosis, not (alas) a donation - and it's not so bad. A bit uncomfortable, but I'd choose one any time over (say) stubbing my toe. It's really nothing to worry about.
> We’re sorry, you’re unable to join our register as you must be aged between 16 and 30.
Boo. Although apparently https://www.dkms.org.uk/ will take people up to 55.
That is for blood donation. See https://www.oslo-universitetssykehus.no/fag-og-forskning/nas... for bone marrow.
I misread and thought blood donations was the topic of this string of comments. Sorry, and thanks for the correction.
One of my coworkers recently shared her personal experience with stem cell donation and I thought it was worth highlighting. It's a great read and may even inspire you to consider donation yourself. You can read it here: https://www.pearlleff.com/stem-cell-donation
comments confirm that HN can find cynicism even in the most basic joyful story on Christmas...
hey HN - THIS IS WHY YOU AREN'T GETTING LAID
It's a cool story and all but did he really need to stop her plane leaving on time and rush over the airport to meet up with her? I mean, they'd met, she was on his frequent flyers account, probably could have just send an email "hey, we were passing by just the other day and I thought of you, want to catch up?" Does she otherwise have to worry that every time she flies someone will stop her travel to recount the story yet again to a bunch of strangers?
> Does she otherwise have to worry that every time she flies someone will stop her travel to recount the story yet again to a bunch of strangers?
Sounds like it:
>> Owing to account notifications, David from time to time surprises Allie at an airport where they both happen to be, he said.
You know, this could make a decent setup for a Brian de Palma thriller: an attractive young cancer researcher volunteers to save the life of a dashing older pilot; in return, he helps her out by offering to add her to his flight benefits. Naïvely, she accepts — but then he keeps on showing up to her flights. Then he starts appearing at a conference presentation. Then at her lab. Then her home. He won’t take ‘you’re welcome’ for an answer.
Looks like a kind of make up story. Or Christmas feel good usual CNN bullshit.
So it is just a friend that met another friend in an airport stopover. Nothing heal related to this encounter. Nothing urgent. And they know each other for years and met also...