Oh hey, a kindred spirit! Among other things, I find it oddly satisfying that zverok also mentioned APL in his post. Save for he being an actual poet and published author, and I not, we share similar sentiments.
The other dissimilarity is that zverok is having to wage actual war, which I can only imagine and maybe not even that, which I've alluded to in my post.
I wrote this some time ago:
As Lovely as a Tree. On the algorithm as a poetic form.
https://tblm.substack.com/p/as-lovely-as-a-tree
Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40688695
Excerpt:
Following any of these threads about the magic, art, craft, and imagination of code will certainly compel us to consider the subject of its beauty, and that of the algorithms within. Ink—old-style and digital—has clearly been spilled on the subject. Albeit, nearly not as much as on beauty itself. Bloodshed is another matter. The millennia-old field of algorithms has morphed into our not-even-centenarian field of computers; a mere newborn, eyes still closed, in the saga of the human condition. They are united not only by shared blood, but that of others spilled for and due to them. Increasingly so, as they permeate all of humanity's projects, projectiles, and pogroms, materialised as computer code. When it comes to that kind of thing, even one spill is one too many.
(edit: add more context)
I'm a poet (published etc) and this was a treat to read. For me the parallels between coding and writing poetry are the iterative quality. As I work on my code I simplify, tighten, code share. I use expressive names, etc. I will think, "This is it!" and then discover the need for another iteration. With poetry it is the same.
Yes! I wouldn't call myself a poet, but I wrote quite a few poems myself, being initially attracted to the formal rules one can use when writing poetry. I perfectly see what you mean, it really felt the same to me.
There was once a lovely project by Ishac Bertran called code {poems}[1]
The project involved collecting code as poems and publishing a collection of poems in hardcover. The final result is wonderful book of poems in the form of executable code.
Slightly off topic, but that’s my connection between poetry and programming.
Alistair Cockburn wrote about it long ago..
https://web.archive.org/web/20170620234716/http://alistair.c...
And yes, IMO software is very twisted way of communicating (knowledge and/or understanding and/or views) through time&space.. same as poetry :)
I majored in English, but I am now a software engineer.
A few things that have held constant for me:
* Readability over cleverness
* The importance of having an outline (even if you don't stick to it)
* The importance of having something that you can work on. Nothing worse than a blank screen.
* Giving and receiving feedback constructively
* The importance of genre and conventions
Poets don't favor "readability"—at least not good poets. They're optimizing for something else altogether.
Well he was a bad poet, that's why he changed field.