Your landing page is doing the heavy lifting here. Nice design.
You should do side by side comparisons of output from GPT4o/Claude and your product to sell me on why I should care about the RAG you added and your tuned prompts.
If you're giving away inference you should probably tell people how you're intending to make money from them. Free services that use expensive APIs are a big red flag for me.
Wow incredible, could you give a small glimpse in how you collected/normalized/vectorized all the different reviews + information? Just lots of scraping + chucking it into Pinecone etc?
> Me: Give a list of the new and old gene sequencing tools
> Reply: Based on the available reviews, I’ve compiled lists of new and old sequencing products mentioned by users: Genemod, Mixmax (email sequencing...?), HubSpot Sales Hub (????)
Are you guys using a pure RAG for your responses? I think you should have a function caller traverse a tree of topics before retrieving data from the right area/space or you'll have lots of "contamination" of similar phrases across fields
Here is some feedback. Your landing page needs samples. After spending 30s I do have some idea about what you're trying to do but some real life samples of input and output will show me exactly what to expect and how good the quality is and eventually if it's worth my time to sign up for it.
Cool idea, but fails one well known fact:
Customers don't know what they want.
That's somewhat true, but trite, and shouldn't imply that you shouldn't listen to customers. It's up to you as a product manager to analyze and synthesize people's feedback and thoughts, integrating it with your other knowledge and constraints, in order to arrive at (as much as possible) well-founded product plans.
If it works well, I think this tool could really help accelerate the process, especially if you can get it to give you its sources, like Perplexity does.
This statement is a russian doll as in it potentially includes the customers using this product ;)
Would you mind sharing a source of the reviews? How your users would know whether your product could be trusted?
Good stuff, it gave me a very fair review of the SaaS I tested it on and suggested good alternatives. This is useful.
I have some MBA friends who wanted to do a “AI powered G2 or Gartner” startup. Which makes me feel like this is a tarpit idea
Very cool. Can you describe any fine tuning or RAG you did? Did you have to go through a bootstrapping process?
Totally get it if you don’t want to share details.
neat! what is your data source?
Well this product is completely useless if it's trained on G2 and Capterra reviews.
Why is that are they mostly fake? Or paid for?
their biz is affiliate marketing. so yea, paid for, effectively.
This one seems like a blatant GPT wrapper. Why not just use 4o?
For example, "Ask any question" the use case shown is:
> "What specific python scripts are users running inside HubSpot?"
I could just ask ChatGPT that too, why would I need this product to answer the question?
Seems like everyone is just wrapping ChatGPT, creating even the identical UI down to the icon on the send button, and then making a Loom showcasing essentially white-labeled OpenAI functionality.
For future devs, what makes a product stand out (for devs) is how you built it. What's the data source? Did you fine-tune your data? Do you have people who already use it? Where does it shine? (no, a prompt isn't good enough).
Also, I don't care about Hubspot reviews when I know the product. Reviews are there for unknown software that are less popular, but even then why are you considering using some half-maintained solution for your enterprise?
Dissuading your colleagues from choosing Oracle Cloud is supported by a substantial amount of negative feedback from users who have encountered various significant issues. Here’s a detailed analysis of the common pain points and frustrations expressed by Oracle Cloud users:
1. Customer Support Issues Incompetent Support Staff: A recurring complaint is the poor quality of customer support. Users have described Oracle's support team as "the worst support staff" with "terrible response times" and an inability to resolve issues effectively. One user stated, "Every time we open Oracle SR's, it's a bad experience. They just ask for logs without providing meaningful help". Lack of Accountability: Complaints also indicate a lack of response to service requests. For instance, "If you complain too much, they will blacklist you and no one will return your calls".
2. Complexity and Bureaucracy Cumbersome Processes: Users describe the setup and integration processes as bureaucratic and overly complicated. One review mentioned, "The whole process of starting with Oracle Cloud is time-consuming and very confusing". Difficult User Interface: The interface has been criticized for its lack of user-friendliness. As one user said, "The user interface of Oracle Cloud was not that great compared to other cloud services like AWS".
3. Performance and Reliability Concerns Frequent Outages and Bugs: Users have reported frequent service outages and buggy software. A user lamented, "Updates fix some bugs but introduce a whole slew of new ones. We feel like beta testers". Integration Problems: A particular concern is the difficulty in integrating Oracle Cloud with other applications, which can hinder productivity.
4. Financial Considerations High Costs vs. Low Value: Although Oracle markets itself as affordable, many users feel the costs do not correlate with the value provided, stating that existing services often do not meet expectations. A user noted, "The POS system is far too expensive compared to others, and my employees hate it".
5. Poor Communication and Informed Decisions Sales Tactics Discrepancies: Numerous users reported that the promises made by sales representatives often didn’t match the delivered product, leading to frustration and mistrust. For example, one user echoed, "Their salespersons will tell you anything you want to get you to sign with them, but later, they make excuses”.
6. Implementation Woes Prolonged Delays in Setup: Several users highlighted issues with the implementation process, which was significantly behind schedule. One review stated, "Oracle did not honor the date they committed to having us up and running, forcing us to open without a POS system".
Conclusion
Given these extensive pain points—ranging from terrible customer support, complex user experience, and integration difficulties to unreliable performance and misaligned sales promises—it’s clear that Oracle Cloud possesses noteworthy drawbacks. Leveraging these insights could certainly aid in persuading your colleagues not to consider this option.
Upon reading the title, my brain took a garden path in the direction of the 3M company.
Same, then it went to “to help with employee interviews“
yeah, shouldn't it be 3m? not 3M?
Or rather 3MM?
Me:
What do users think about Reviewradar?
Reviewradar:
User feedback on ReviewRadar varies, with many appreciating its functionality while some indicate areas that could use improvement. Here’s a detailed breakdown of sentiments based on user reviews:
Positive Aspects:
User Experience: Many users noted that the interface is intuitive and easy to navigate. One user expressed that ReviewRadar is "the best source of software reviews," highlighting the visibility and transparency it provides.
Comprehensive Review Collection: Users value the centralized nature of reviews, stating it allows for easy tracking and management of their online reputation. One respondent emphasized, "I can point possible customers to ReviewRadar, and they know that I haven't falsified any reviews".
Support and Updates: Some users appreciated the support team, remarking that they were responsive and helpful during the onboarding process. There’s a notable emphasis on the quick resolution time for any issues.
Critical Feedback:
Integration Limitations: A recurring theme in feedback pertains to a need for better integration with other applications. For instance, users have mentioned, "It would be great to see Google My Business integration" as a valuable addition.
Clarity in Reviews: While many find the review process thorough, some users have pointed out that there were instances of what they perceived as biased or unreliable reviews. This is particularly concerning in a landscape where fake reviews can distort genuine customer experiences.
Feature Requests: Certain users expressed the desire for more customization options in dashboards and reporting features, indicating that the current setup could be streamlined to improve usability.
General Sentiment:
The overall impression of ReviewRadar is largely positive, with a community of users who find it helpful in gathering insights and managing their online reviews. However, users desire enhancements in integrations and feature sets to maximize its potential.
Conclusion:
In summary, if you’re contemplating using ReviewRadar, the platform seems to be effective for managing software reviews and tracking customer feedback. Yet, be aware of the requests for improvements in integration and functionality from existing users.
If you have any specific features or areas in mind that you'd like to explore further, let me know!
Congrats on the good work! Do as https://x.com/levelsio does, keep iterating, and make it better over time.